OPEN ASSEMBLY

Experiments in Aesthetics and Politics

Racial Empathy, Entanglement, and Virtual Reality

Published on: December 22, 2018
By: Kit Copeland

The coalition emerges out of your recognition that it’s fucked up for you, in the same way that we’ve already recognized that it’s fucked up for us. I don’t need your help. I just need you to recognize that this shit is killing you, too, however much more softly, you stupid motherfucker, you know?
–Fred Moten and Stefano Harney, The Undercommons

Since 2015, the United Nations Virtual Reality (UNVR) has been making Virtual Reality films that depict vulnerable lives, shown primarily to audiences of “decision makers.” Shown on “high tech headsets,” the films transport the viewer to “another time and place,” where they gain a three dimensional, 360° perspective on “crises that threaten the livelihoods of vulnerable groups such as war, health epidemics and natural disasters, and every day global challenges such as climate change, pollution, and migration.”

For example, the first VR film made by the UNVR was shot in Za’atri Camp, Jordan, December 2014, and follows the life of a twelve-year-old girl named Sidra, who had been living as a refugee in Za’atri camp for over a year at the time of filming. According to the UNVR website, the film, titled Clouds of Sidara, will “generate greater empathy and new perspectives on people living in conditions of great vulnerability,” and “has the ability to inspire the message of hope among not only the millions displaced but also those motivated to act.”

On December 7th, 2018, digital media scholar Lisa Nakamura gave a lecture at the West Hollywood public library titled “Ethnic Studies After the Third Industrial Revolution: Automating Racial Empathy Through Virtual Reality.” Projects such as UNVR are the subject of her interest, as she extends an analysis of technologies that are intended for the teaching and learning of empathy, especially across racial difference, and, as in the case of  UNVR, for people living in the wake of disasters, wars and epidemics. The first industrial revolution was characterized by the implementation of technologies that significantly reduced the need for human manual labor; and the second by a reduction in the need for human cognitive labor. The third industrial revolution, to which Nakamura’s title refers, is the implementation of technologies that explore the possibilities for outsourcing affective labor to machines.

While not explicitly stated, the problems that UNVR attempts to address and rehabilitate are the practiced numbnesses (broadly of the dominant social positions of whiteness, wealth and cis, heterosexual masculinity) that produce an empathic incapacity. The ability to put yourself in another’s shoes is accepted implicitly by the UNVR initiative as a necessary step in a linear process toward understanding the subjugated, vulnerable other, and feeling motivated to take action (donate money) to help. 

However, as Dr Grace Kyungwon Hong said in her response to Nakamura’s lecture, empathy is dangerous. It is dangerous not because it asks people to imagine themselves otherwise, but because it asks people to imagine themselves as “the same” – equivalent to another. A sociality based on equivalency subtends a colorblind liberalism that shifts focus away from the structural power dynamics that lead to radically differentiated positionalities in relation to the allocation of protections and/or exposures to violence. This differentiation produces and perpetuates the radical ontological vulnerabilities and material inequalities that colonial projects effect. Moreover, the UNVR project relies on an assumption that one person is imaginatively substitutable for another, that humans occupy corresponding, bounded, and therefore independent social and juridical positions. This assumption limits a vision or model of relationality to that which already exists. If we are to move away from structures that produce and reproduce violence, we need to imagine new relational forms. The UNVR project is an attempt to technologically produce the recognition of another’s humanity, and by this logic, provide them with a greater semblance of the rights they ought to have. Human rights discourse requires that people are drawn into the conditional frameworks of a juridical order, which normalizes discursive structures such as the victim-perpetrator model, the manipulation and weaponization of innocence, and is ultimately constituted by strategic dehumanization and state-sanctioned and murder.

The incitement of empathy in the guiltily privileged is, of course, not new. Charities and NGOs use images and language in their announcements and commercials to persuade us to donate. These usually involve a synthesis of factors designed to appeal to an imaginary formed out of complacency, ignorance and a distance from the conditions depicted. The combination is familiar and often formulaic: a graphic demonstration of the physical, psychical and/or infrastructural effects of disaster (often through the perspective of an extra-innocent, extra-vulnerable child); an affirmation of the dignity, resilience, and work ethic of the “victims;” and the reassuring promise of restoration or cure. These appeals to guilt are based in commercial frameworks. Donate, feel better, and then get the rights to one-up your friends because you’re doing your bit. The result is a circular entrenchment of a producer-consumer, victim-saviour power dynamic. Empathy produces a re-affirmation of a sense of self based in superiority and the reenforcement of the relational separation between the donor and the subjects of their substitutional identification.

Given this need to go beyond the limits of an empathic imaginary, rather than asking “why we can’t feel the right feelings on our own?” or wondering how we can learn to feel in a way that leads us toward “action,” perhaps the question should be: do we really need to access and understand the point of view of another to avoid unmitigated violence and resource extraction? Besides, as Nakamura pointed out in her lecture the affective response to the vicarious experience of another’s suffering as likely to be one of sadistic pleasure as heartbroken empathic identification. The consumption of the suffering of the other creates a violently appropriative relation between the spectator and the “decision-maker” wearing the headset.

So instead of focussing on empathy or its lack, and assuming that human experience is communicable to the point of being consumable and assimilable through media, what if we were to accept the fundamental difference and opacity of all bodies, moving beyond empathy into a different imaginary? What shifts would result from ending the assumption that imagining ourselves in another’s position would improve their situation?    

While I am wary of making recourse to english etymology as a way to make a claim about the limits of existing tools for thinking beyond the limits of our colonial imaginary, I have found it useful to unpack the definition of virtual reality. “Virtual,” is defined as artificial, not real, or simulated, so, obvious though this might seem, virtual reality is an oxymoron that requires a suspension of disbelief, even on a discursive or conceptual level. However, “virtual” might also mean almost, effectively, or near enough. Almost reality is different to the notion of simulated reality, and this overlooked or elided difference might be a useful way to link the notion of virtuality to the economic, appropriative nature of the technology, as well as way to connect with theories that gesture toward new ways of relating not based in the impulse to locate and identify (with) an other. VR’s usage for the purposes of providing safe experiences of suffering to those who would not otherwise understand it dramatizes the slippage between these two ideas: the elision of the almost and the not real creates another oxymoron that asks to be accepted as the viewer attempts to experience another’s reality. The fundamental insufficiency of the technology and the perpetual impossibility of grasping the position of the other is suspended as simulation is regarded as enough.

The idea that something can be enough at all implies a prefigured ideal which comes to be adequately satisfied, so the possibility of enoughness requires a defined or evaluated capacity that can be filled. In an economic sense, the “decision maker” who gets to wear the headset might be moved to compensate for others’ vulnerability. Their movement is transactional and completable. It it based on a principle of exchange that, as Nakamura said in her talk, puts the Other, or Undercommons, to work: their precarious lives provide the content that might allow wealthy spectators to overcome the limitations of their capacity to understand.

In this framework, Understanding  is founded in an apprehensive, grasping and colonial logic. Denise Ferriera da Silva writes in her essay “On Difference Without Separability“:

…the available critical tools cannot support an ethico-political intervention capable of undermining cultural difference’s capacity to produce an unbridgeable ethical divide. That is, they cannot effectively interrupt deployments of otherwise unacceptable total violence onto those placed on “the Other” (cultural) side of humanity. Why? Because they also rehearse the modern text’s scientific imaging of the World as an ordered whole composed of separate parts relating through the mediation of constant units of measurement and/or a limiting violent force.

In terms of the ethical project that UNVR is attempting to fulfill, da Silva outlines that Understanding, which is analogous to the assumption that one can truly occupy another’s shoes, is based on two main principles, which are based in an Enlightenment program. The first, separability, refers to the supposition that knowledge is limited to things that are conceivable by the senses and categorizable in terms that might be translated. Under this principle, what is inconceivable becomes irrelevant. The second, related, notion, determinacy, relates to the role of “formal constructs” that are regarded as necessary to define and make sense of that which the senses apprehend. Against the resulting assumption that identities are analogous (under a framework of human rights, each person ostensibly occupies an equal unit) and that they are parts of a whole that can be conceived as juridically, spatially and temporally ordered, da Silva proposes the imagining of an “Entangled World.” She writes:

What if, instead of the Ordered World, we imagined each existant (human and more than human) not as separate forms relating through the the mediation of forces, but rather as singular expressions of each and every other existant as well as of the entangled whole in/as which they exist?

The idea of entanglement is from particle physics, and relates to the spatial proximity of particles such that each one is dependent on the others, and the system can only be expressed in terms of a whole; objects may only be described in relation to one another. If we understand existence in terms of entanglement, then we undermine the notion that bodies and objects are locatable and separable at all, and therefore retain something of the virtual, of the excess that is ungrasped. In contrast to thinking the notion of the virtual as closed or “enough,” da Silva uses the concept of virtuality to discuss the impossibility of understanding in terms of determinacy and separability. To restrict reality to phenomena, she writes, is to reduce, and this reduction reproduces existing forms of relations that dominate and exclude. Estrangement, based in the perpetual nonfulfillment of the implicit expectation that apprehension is possible, is the inevitable consequence of difference in terms of separability. But da Silva asks us to imagine Entanglement on a social level. What happens when we conceive of our existence as fundamentally non locatable, non separable and uncertain? Only a shift away from the impulse to apprehend the world, extract from it the information that we need, and discard the rest, or as da Silva puts it “the end of the world as we know it,” will undermine the production of strangeness, and fix and locate bodies as others, making humans distinct in terms of their position in relation to dominant modes, languages and scales.

*

In her response to Nakamura, Dr. Hong quoted Robin D.G. Kelly, from his book Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical Imagination:

Too often, our standards for evaluating social movements pivot around whether or not they “succeeded” in realizing their visions rather than on the merits or power of the visions themselves. By such a measure, virtually every radical movement failed because the basic power relations they sought to change remained pretty much intact. And yet it is precisely these alternative visions and dreams that inspire new generations to struggle for change.

Kelley writes that according to a scale that measures in terms of the realization of the desired change in power relations, then social movements will almost always be seen to fail, or never be enough. However, looking beyond or outside a scale based in calculable, realized “actualities” allows us to pay attention instead to the the radical imaginaries that they produce. Perhaps the acknowledgement of the virtual (in a similar sense that Kelley uses it here, as not all, or not completely) makes space for comfort with a fundamental unknowability.

In terms of acceptance of difference without the impulse toward equivalence does not mean that we should stop trying to communicate across difference, form coalitions, share resources and knowledges. However, accepting our social condition as fundamentally entangled, which might be seen as analogous to Moten and Harney’s “this shit is killing you, too,” or the Austrailian Aboriginal Activists’ group’s “if you have come because your liberation is bound up with mine, then let us work together” might be to undermine the impulse to violently apprehend, exclude or consume the other. 

 

 

 

...Show All Tags
... And Couting 2018 Guangzhou Triennial 2020 abolition activism advertising aesthetics Aesthetics & Politics Aesthetics and politics affect Afro-Futurism afropessimism agonism ai AI art Aidrley Queiros Aimee Bahng algorithmic bias alt-right alum alumni American history American Mythologies anarcha-feminism Anarchafeminism Anarchism andrea fontenot Andy Warhol animal studies anime Anthropocene anti-abortion anti-blackness Antiaesthetics aporetic argentina aria dean Armor art Art Critic Art History Art prompt artificial intelligence Asia asian american art Asian Art Asian Futurity assembly associations aural auto-fiction automation Beijing Being Human beluga Biswas Mellamphy Black lives matter black out black studies black study Blm blockchain Blondie body Boots Riley borderlands Branco Sai Preto Fica Brasil bratich Bridget Crone Bring springer CalArts California Institute of the Arts calvin l. warren calvin warren Capital capital is dead capitalism carceral tech carceral technologies carceral technology care Carlos Villa cars CBGB CCM Censorship Charity Chiara Bottici china Chinese Art chinese philosophy Christian Dior Christopher Kulendran Thomas chronology cinema citizneship class Claude Monet collective Colombia Coloniality comics Community computer science Contemporary Art Contemporary Chinese Art content moderation control coronavirus Cosmetics covid Covid-19 creaturely criminal justice Crisis Criticism Critique crypto Cuba Cuba Revolution Cuban Art culture curation Dance Daniela Lieja Quintanar data data collection data sourcing Debbie Harry decoloniality Dennis Cooper desire Deway-Hagbord Diaspora dictee digital digital art digital culture Digital Media digital tools diversity Documentation Donna Haraway Doris Salcedo DOXA drag Drag King drag name drifting drones ecological ecology Ed Fornieles Édouard Glissant Eminem emory Empathy exhibition experimental experimental film experimentalpublication exploitation extinction facial hair Fascism fash-wave fashion feminism fiction film flicker fluxus foreign labor foucault franco barchiesi Frank O'Hara FREEPLAY Futura 2000 gabriel rockhill gas Gean Moreno gender geography Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari Gloria Anzaldua Grebowicz Halston Hannah Arendt Hauntology Havana Hermeneutics hip hop hipsters Hiroshi Fujiwara historicism HIV/AIDS horror human Human rights hypebeasts hyper-masculinity identity im here to learn so :)))))) image theory impressionism individuation industrial revolution industrialization infrapolitics Infrastructure Instagram Installation Intelligence Gathering Intelligence Led Policing Intergalactix internet internet of things INTERPRETATION intersectionality intimacy Invisible Hand irony j kameron carter Jaar jack bratich Jack Burnham Jazz Jean-François Lyotard Jemima Wyman Jennifer Ponce de Leon John-Michael Rivera Judith Butler Julian Stallabrass Kara Keeling Karina Alma kathy acker Kettling Khademi kinging koreanamericanliterature Kubra Khademi LA LA RIver lapd LARPing larval warfare Larvas Warfare LATERAL Latin America Latin-America Latino American Latinx Studies Latipa Laurie Anderson Les Immatériaux exhibition libidinal Line Dance linette park Lisa Nakamura Los Angeles Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions loss Louis Vuitton Luciana Parisi Mahakali Manuel Shartzberg Marc Jacobs Marianne Hirsh marketing Marvel marxism masculinity matias viegener Maurice Merleau-Ponty mckenzie wark Medea media theory Mellamphy memory metaphysics METHOD metic Mètis MGMT Misael Oquendo montage mourning Mudd Club museum Music Nan Z. Da Nandita Biswas Mellamphy Necro-Politics Necropolitics net art NFT nicholas mirzeoff Nike niunamenos noc non-fungible tokens nonhuman nylan October ontological terror ontology packers paint tube painting panopticism Parametricism Patrik Schumacher Paul Preciado Performance persuasion Peru Pettman phantasmagoria photography pleasure plurality Poetics poetry poiesis police police state police training politics pop music popular culture Pose post-human post-millennial Postmemory Predictive Policing PrEP prison abolition psychology punk QUANTITATIVE quarantine queer queer calculus queer media Queer Theory ra judy Race race and racialization Rachel Garfield Racial Empathy rationality READING Real Abstraction reality reductionism resistance Revolution rhizome Rihanna Robot Skin Ronak Kapadia Rosalind Krauss RuPaul Ryan Murphy Sarah T. Roberts sci-fi Science Fiction screenshot Sculpture sentient flesh SHAKESPEARE ShanaL Redmond skin Skoghall Konsthall smart cities smart city sneakers social media Socialism sociology Soft Science Fiction Software exhibition solitude sonic sonic voice sound space spatial justice spectacle and counter spectacle Speculative Fiction speed Spin Sri Lankan civil war Stephen Sprouse Stop LAPD Spying Coalition structural film structuralism STRUCTURE student repression subcultures suggestion superheroes Surveillance Susan Buck-Morss Swarm Intelligence syllabus systems analysis systems art Systems Esthetics T5311 Taylor Swift techno-orientalism temporality Teresa Margolles terror TEXT The Aesthetics of Net Art the archive The Body the disappointment the imaginal The Modular Body The Postmodern Condition the refrain the sky opened up with answers the tiller girls The Zapatistas Theorist in Residence theory theresahakkyungcha Thierry de Duve Thor thought experiments TikTok time Tomás Esson trans fem aesthetics trans literature Transindividual transindividuality trauma Undocumented UNDOCUMENTS Urban Space Victoria Ivanova Video Art video essay vignette virality Virtual Reality visibility visual activism visual categories visual culture Visual Studies Visuality voice VR wafaa bilal war on terror War on Youth whale WHAP Womanhood Yiyun Li Zac's Haunted House Zach Blas

Other posts by this author