Experiments in Aesthetics and Politics

Ebb and Flow of Parametricism: Urban Space as a Challenge of Design and Infrastructure

Published on: October 28, 2018
By: Josh Widera

In 2015, Matthew Poole and Manuel Shvartzberg edited a volume of essays called Politics of Parametricism: Digital Technologies in Architecture. Following the launch, they were invited to talk at the WHAP! lecture series in 2016.

In the following text I will summarise Manuel Shvartzberg’s WHAP! lecture, respond to its main claim which links deregulation and parametricism in the hopes of an organic and effective urban development practice, and comment on why parametricism has since then again somewhat fallen off the radar.

0: What is parametricism?

Parametricism is a term coined by Patrik Schumacher, principal of Zaha Hadid Architects, in 2008:

‘Systematic, adaptive variation, continuous differentiation (rather than mere variety), and dynamic, parametric figuration concerns all design tasks from urbanism to the level of tectonic detail, interior furnishings and the world of products… The task is to develop an architectural and urban repertoire that is geared up to create complex, polycentric urban and architectural fields which are densely layered and continuously differentiated.’[1]

As a method, parametricism draws on algorithms and programs to influence design processes. It sets itself against both the homogenisation of central planning, and the pure difference of completely unrelated elements. Instead, each component in the parametric approach influences the entire equation and thus has an influence on the next design element. The hoped-for result remains legible while being complex and, as argued by Schumacher, can cater to the consumer needs of the post-Fordist multitude.

1: Shvartzberg’s history of parametricism

Manuel Shvartzberg’s presentation is a historical ontology, working to root parametricism in a larger historical context, primarily by telling the history of the (digital) swarm.

It begins in 1987 by an article published in Computer Graphics by Craig W. Reynolds, titled “Flocks, Herds and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model.” This article, which stirred waves far beyond the usual audience of a rather specific journal, was quoted by sociologists and biologists as much as people working in the field of programming. In it, Reynolds describes the results of a program he had developed, which could simulate swarms of birds and other lifeforms. The movement of “flocks, schools and herds” was ultimately unpredictable and not centrally organised, yet could still be simulated through three rules, Shvartzberg recounts:

    1. Keep equal distance from others
    2. Don’t change speed abruptly
    3. Avoid stationary objects

This modelling has found application in many fields; Reynolds himself moved on to design swarms of artificial life for the movie industry. In the field of architecture, which Shvartzberg is primarily interested in, it constitutes one of the backbones of parametricism. It is this swarm behaviour that legitimises the logic of uncoordinated yet coherent urban planning and building.

Drawing from Schumacher’s belief that parametricism is the answer to an evermore globalising architectural practice, swarm aesthetics too is seen by Shvartzberg as a geopolitical movement. In fact, Shvartzberg argues, Adam Smith’s allegorical use of the invisible hand to describe the self-regulating market can be reimagined through the logic of the swarm. Another crucial step in the development of this thinking is rational choice economic theory, developed just down the road from the location of the lecture, in Santa Monica, in the headquarters of the RAND corporation, and what Shvartzberg calls microeconomic devices.

As a second dimension of the development of parametricisim, Shvartzberg recounts the narrative of the MIT Media Lab, founded in 1985 by Nicholas Negroponte. This Media Lab grew out of the Epistemology and Learning Research Group at the MIT Architecture Machine Group, founded by Seymour Papert. 

Papert had been the lead developer of logo, a programming language with which children could learn basic concepts of programming as well as geometry and mathematics in an environment of self-learning. This second leg of Shvartzberg’s story again proves parametricism’s belief in self-learning and decentralisation.

The swarm architecture and urbanism that Shvartzberg speaks about is a clear response to and criticism of modernism and central planning, of which Soviet constructivism is the ultimate example. Finding himself disillusioned with central decision-making’s ability to answer the needs of its consumers, Shvartzberg’s position is one critical of coordinated social action and central planning and he draws out a dichotomy of soviet constructivist central planning on one hand and a neoliberal swarm as its answer on the other.

2: Parametricism and organic urban development

Disenchanted by the many failures of centralised planning initiatives throughout the 20th century. Shvartsberg presents parametricism, in its conceptual link to swarm intelligence, as a potential solution to urban problems. This proposition is understandable and interesting. Parametricism’s possible ability to respond effectively and flexibly to any urban environment is a great opportunity. He hopes that the swarm, as a new invisible hand, might hold the key to a coordinated yet decentralised growth that ties the swarm as a type of rationality to the political language of vitalism and deregulation. It seems we have found a technology that can straddle the invisible hand and be unleashed for the greater good of any city.

As part of this proposition, Shvartzberg is evoking organic, dense cities, which grow in a self-responsive and complex way and are also aesthetically stimulating. Two of the city spaces Shvartzberg is working with are Barcelona and Marrakech. It seems to be of little importance, that the aerial photograph of Marrakech is depicting a kind of organic city development which predates the neoliberal/soviet dialectic Shvartzberg at other times is invoking. Of course, swarm intelligence has arguably always been around, but the examples certainly were not created through parametricism and thus do not necessarily strengthen an argument for a contemporary neoliberal agenda of deregulation. While I can imagine that Marrakech has not grown by centralised planning in the last few centuries, I cannot vouch for it to have been a climate of deregulated open markets. Similarly, some of the major projects and experiments in Barcelona, such as its famous superblocks, are centrally planned and executed through the city’s housing and mobility plans. And if we look at some of the global cities that are being increasingly deregulated in an ongoing commodification of both public space and the right for housing—as is the case for example in Los Angeles, which is currently undergoing major re-zoning, tax incentives and removal of regulatory boundaries to stimulate investment and development—we can see that the resulting buildings might not necessarily turn out to be organic structures of both complexity and legibility, as Schumacher and Shvartzberg would hope. Rather, they might result in the homogenisation of space, much like the Soviet residential blocks Shvartzberg is so afraid of. And while in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia the right to housing was famously enshrined in law, Los Angeles and other cities on a decade-long trajectory of progressing deregulation is struggling with an apparent problem with homelessness and a population that spends an average of 41% of their monthly income on rent.

To be clear, Shvartzberg is by no means uncritically advertising for a neoliberalisation of architecture, urbanism and politics. While his disbelief in central planning definitely comes through in the lecture, he does not take a clear position on the parametric response offered by Schumacher and others. Instead, Shvartzberg limits himself to a historical contextualisation of the phenomenon—though a certain hopefulness can be sensed.

3: Schumacher—a complicated ally

I believe that Shvartzberg is well aware that things are not simply black and white. There is a definite allure to parametricism, both conceptually, as well as aesthetically, and Shvartzberg is clearly drawn to it. However, he also does not try to amplify or advertise any particular ideology and seems aware of both risks and opportunities that come with this practice and its politics.

Shvartzberg’s and Poole’s book is trying to make sense of the movement of parametricism in a comprehensive fashion, at times generous, at times critical. And yet, even this engagement seems partially problematic. However, parametricism has arguably failed to have the impact Poole and Shvartzberg are prophesising. To large extent, this might be due to parametricism’s ‘inventor’: since the publication of the book, Patrik Schumacher, who also wrote the first chapter for it, has made himself rather unpopular. He has hailed Brexit as an opportunity ‘to roll back the interventionist state and unleash entrepreneurial creativity’ and proposed to eliminate social housing and privatise streets. Meanwhile, the prolific anarcho-capitalist believes himself misrepresented and demonised.

Schumacher has become a taboo for many, but what are the implications of such an ostracisation for Shvartzberg and his book? Shvartzberg has since expressed some regret for the ‘undue megaphone some of us gave him.’[2] Albeit his engagement with Schumacher’s thought was sympathetic, it was perhaps also comparably critical. In the article that is attempting to make sense with Schumacher’s unpopular statements, Shvartzberg’s own engagement with him, and the simultaneous rise to power of Donald Trump, Shvartzberg writes that ‘Schumacher critically mischaracterised “thought” for a form of ideology that took the most formulaic tenets of “neoliberalism” and gave them a veneer of realism, even flesh.’ [cite]

In this insightful analysis, which sometimes reads as a letter of apology and confession, sometimes as a defence of Shvartzberg’s own position, we can find out a lot to make sense of the ambiguity I felt when watching his WHAP! Lecture:

Schumacher embodies architecture’s love affair with a neoliberal script of productivity at all costs, of relentless managerial optimization, and of a division of labor whereby architects disavow their critical faculties to become mere operators in a market for purely instrumental design services.

In his repetitive calls for a new world architecture, “parametricism,” we failed to see the totality of which his compulsions were an expression. In fact, it was always right in front of us—a macho mentality of control masked by an obsession with functional operating systems, governed by automatized heuristics and axiomatics; an architecture of meaningless flows; a politics of the city subsumed within a fixed set of procedures mediated by technocrats and bound, suffocatingly, by moralistic economic rules—the totalizing vision to which his architectural project uniquely gives form.

He goes on to criticise Schumacher’s parochialism in the ‘two key dimensions of his rhetoric, the universalizing, if not actually planetary, scale at which he pitches his ideas, and the focus on managerial ethos, systems, and tools that makes it a project of governmentality’ while also underlining the importance of this double focus, something he already mentioned in the lecture, when speaking of both the geopolitical reach and microeconomic devices.

4: Looking forward—turning our gaze to infrastructure

Shvartzberg goes on to, with the help of Keller Easterling’s Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space, line out the impasses and possibilities of our current thinking on infrastructure, coming to the conclusion that ‘to make these accounts as technically detailed as possible, but also as inclusive and sensitive to actually existing solidarity, dissent, forced equivalences, and structural determinations, is our best defense against authoritarian hegemonies—of the Schumacher-Trump variety or otherwise—and our best chance at thinking a truly different world.’

To me, it seems that this turn back towards infrastructure is Shvartzberg refocussing on the complexity of urban space, rather than his earlier engagement with a particular response to that. Acknowledging the difficulty of the urban question rather than amplifying a simple answer, Shvartzberg is once again opening up to scholarship, to multiple ways of response, and invites us to delve into an important and interesting field full of contradictions, complications, and avenues.

Josh Widera is a graduate student in the Aesthetics & Politics program at CalArts.

...Show All Tags
... And Couting 2018 Guangzhou Triennial 2020 abolition activism advertising aesthetics Aesthetics & Politics Aesthetics and politics affect Afro-Futurism afropessimism agonism ai AI art Aidrley Queiros Aimee Bahng algorithmic bias alt-right alum alumni American history American Mythologies anarcha-feminism Anarchafeminism Anarchism andrea fontenot Andy Warhol animal studies anime Anthropocene anti-abortion anti-blackness Antiaesthetics aporetic argentina aria dean Armor art Art Critic Art History Art prompt artificial intelligence Asia asian american art Asian Art Asian Futurity assembly associations aural auto-fiction automation Beijing Being Human beluga Biswas Mellamphy Black lives matter black out black studies black study Blm blockchain Blondie body Boots Riley borderlands Branco Sai Preto Fica Brasil bratich Bridget Crone Bring springer CalArts California Institute of the Arts calvin l. warren calvin warren Capital capital is dead capitalism carceral tech carceral technologies carceral technology care Carlos Villa cars CBGB CCM Censorship Charity Chiara Bottici china Chinese Art chinese philosophy Christian Dior Christopher Kulendran Thomas chronology cinema citizneship class Claude Monet collective Colombia Coloniality comics Community computer science Contemporary Art Contemporary Chinese Art content moderation control coronavirus Cosmetics covid Covid-19 creaturely criminal justice Crisis Criticism Critique crypto Cuba Cuba Revolution Cuban Art culture curation Dance Daniela Lieja Quintanar data data collection data sourcing Debbie Harry decoloniality Dennis Cooper desire Deway-Hagbord Diaspora dictee digital digital art digital culture Digital Media digital tools diversity Documentation Donna Haraway Doris Salcedo DOXA drag Drag King drag name drifting drones ecological ecology Ed Fornieles Édouard Glissant Eminem emory Empathy exhibition experimental experimental film experimentalpublication exploitation extinction facial hair Fascism fash-wave fashion feminism fiction film flicker fluxus foreign labor foucault franco barchiesi Frank O'Hara FREEPLAY Futura 2000 gabriel rockhill gas Gean Moreno gender geography Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari Gloria Anzaldua Grebowicz Halston Hannah Arendt Hauntology Havana Hermeneutics hip hop hipsters Hiroshi Fujiwara historicism HIV/AIDS horror human Human rights hypebeasts hyper-masculinity identity im here to learn so :)))))) image theory impressionism individuation industrial revolution industrialization infrapolitics Infrastructure Instagram Installation Intelligence Gathering Intelligence Led Policing Intergalactix internet internet of things INTERPRETATION intersectionality intimacy Invisible Hand irony j kameron carter Jaar jack bratich Jack Burnham Jazz Jean-François Lyotard Jemima Wyman Jennifer Ponce de Leon John-Michael Rivera Judith Butler Julian Stallabrass Kara Keeling Karina Alma kathy acker Kettling Khademi kinging koreanamericanliterature Kubra Khademi LA LA RIver lapd LARPing larval warfare Larvas Warfare LATERAL Latin America Latin-America Latino American Latinx Studies Latipa Laurie Anderson Les Immatériaux exhibition libidinal Line Dance linette park Lisa Nakamura Los Angeles Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions loss Louis Vuitton Luciana Parisi Mahakali Manuel Shartzberg Marc Jacobs Marianne Hirsh marketing Marvel marxism masculinity matias viegener Maurice Merleau-Ponty mckenzie wark Medea media theory Mellamphy memory metaphysics METHOD metic Mètis MGMT Misael Oquendo montage mourning Mudd Club museum Music Nan Z. Da Nandita Biswas Mellamphy Necro-Politics Necropolitics net art NFT nicholas mirzeoff Nike niunamenos noc non-fungible tokens nonhuman nylan October ontological terror ontology packers paint tube painting panopticism Parametricism Patrik Schumacher Paul Preciado Performance persuasion Peru Pettman phantasmagoria photography pleasure plurality Poetics poetry poiesis police police state police training politics pop music popular culture Pose post-human post-millennial Postmemory Predictive Policing PrEP prison abolition psychology punk QUANTITATIVE quarantine queer queer calculus queer media Queer Theory ra judy Race race and racialization Rachel Garfield Racial Empathy rationality READING Real Abstraction reality reductionism resistance Revolution rhizome Rihanna Robot Skin Ronak Kapadia Rosalind Krauss RuPaul Ryan Murphy Sarah T. Roberts sci-fi Science Fiction screenshot Sculpture sentient flesh SHAKESPEARE ShanaL Redmond skin Skoghall Konsthall smart cities smart city sneakers social media Socialism sociology Soft Science Fiction Software exhibition solitude sonic sonic voice sound space spatial justice spectacle and counter spectacle Speculative Fiction speed Spin Sri Lankan civil war Stephen Sprouse Stop LAPD Spying Coalition structural film structuralism STRUCTURE student repression subcultures suggestion superheroes Surveillance Susan Buck-Morss Swarm Intelligence syllabus systems analysis systems art Systems Esthetics T5311 Taylor Swift techno-orientalism temporality Teresa Margolles terror TEXT The Aesthetics of Net Art the archive The Body the disappointment the imaginal The Modular Body The Postmodern Condition the refrain the sky opened up with answers the tiller girls The Zapatistas Theorist in Residence theory theresahakkyungcha Thierry de Duve Thor thought experiments TikTok time Tomás Esson trans fem aesthetics trans literature Transindividual transindividuality trauma Undocumented UNDOCUMENTS Urban Space Victoria Ivanova Video Art video essay vignette virality Virtual Reality visibility visual activism visual categories visual culture Visual Studies Visuality voice VR wafaa bilal war on terror War on Youth whale WHAP Womanhood Yiyun Li Zac's Haunted House Zach Blas

Other posts by this author