OPEN ASSEMBLY

Experiments in Aesthetics and Politics

Dolls Against Dominion!: Anarchafeminism and Plurality of the Woman in Relation to Queerness/Transness

Published on: May 14, 2021
By: Courtney Loi

Cover image is titled “Anarchafeminist Manifesto” and is from autonomies.org

Keywords: Anarchafeminism, intersectionality, plurality, individuation, transindividuality, the imaginal, spectacle and counter spectacle, reductionism, womanhood as processes

On March 18, 2021, philosopher Chiara Bottici and artist Boris Ondreička gave a lecture as part of the West Hollywood Aesthetics and Politics (WHAP!) series. Chiara Bottici, the focus of this blog post, is a feminist professor of gender studies, experimental writer, theorist, and imaginator that challenges conventional binary divergences of feminist theory. Throughout the evening, comments and questions from attendees will be collected in the livestream chat and critically assessed in conversation following the lecture.The Spring 2021 Lecture Series, “The Game of the Real: Art and the Knowledge Project,” is presented by the CalArts School of Critical Studies and the West Hollywood Public Library. The lecture was held virtually at 12:00 PST and can be viewed here.

Throughout her lecture for WHAP! and text “Anarchafeminist Manifesto,” Chiara Bottici analyzes the connections between feminism, power, and especially the interconnectedness of women and community. She expands the seemingly binary definition of “woman” into a living term, which constantly changes along with the people who exist in the spaces outside of the most visible and championed binaries of manhood, whiteness, and sovereign v. subjects. Using this arguably Queer Theory perspective, Bottici theorizes “transindividuality,” which can be described as an unbreakable connection between the individual, the individual’s experiences, the individual’s community around them, and the loop of affect individuals and community experience through these boundless connections. It can also be described as the infiniteness of the individual.

This blog post acts as a diary of key lines and passages from Bottici’s WHAP! lecture as well as her Anarchafeminist Manifesto text with quote analyses and further questions to consider, mimicking the infinite loop model of transindividualism. Not all the questions have (or need) answers, some questions have infinite answers, and sometimes questions and answers can be synonymous. We pay special attention to these theories in the context of queerness and transness, and what they say about the potentiality of the individual and community. I highlight especially significant phrases and words in these quotes in bold and ask readers, while reading and interacting with these passages and quotes, to pay special attention to the key wording identified, ask yourself questions about what is being said, and to assess the questions I have pointed out in my analyses- either with further questions, or considering possible attempts to address them.

Anarchafeminism and the State

Image by @anarcha-feminism on Reddit

“Feminism becomes elitist with the inclusion of the state” (“Imaginal Feminism” Lecture, 15:33).

Feminism cannot exist alongside capitalism and structures of institutional power. Neoliberal feminism does nothing but allow women to oppress other women in the same or similar capacities as men based on factors that contribute to their usefulness or assimilation to colonialism.

“…if we want to understand how the oppression of women works, we cannot limit ourselves to one single factor…but need to investigate the way in which a plurality of such factors intersect with one another to reinforce and reproduce the inferior position of women” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 94). “…there is something specific about the oppression of women and that in order to fight it you have to fight all other forms of oppression. Otherwise said, it means defending a position that is both feminist and anarchist at the same time” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 95).

“‘Feminism does not mean female corporate power or a woman president: it means no corporate power and no president’” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 106). “Feminism, today more than in the past, cannot mean women sovereign rulers of women successful capitalists: it means no sovereignty and no capitalism” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 106).

Anarchafeminism is distinct from feminism in that it directly addresses both the connections between misogyny and profit/power, but also the detrimental effects of faux feminism that does not address the interaction of these concepts. This quote refers back to Bottici’s statement that “feminism becomes elitist with the inclusion of the state.” There is no such thing as a feminism that fulfills its intended purpose of “equality for women” when it involves the participation of the very structures of power that have ensured the oppression of women, especially women that fall further and further away from colonial ideals of power and money.


“…by reducing the problem of women’s oppression to the single factor of economic exploitation, Marxism ended up dominating feminism precisely in the same way in which men in a patriarchal society dominate women” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 104).

Bottici introduces the limitations of Marxist theory here by criticizing Marx’s assessment of women’s oppression as being the product of one single entity- capitalism and economic exploitation. In the very nature of the concept of transindividuality, there is not “this” and “that,” there is never a single inside and outside, cause and effect. There are infinite factors interacting at once that contributes to the oppression of women and marginalized identities. Women’s oppression goes beyond simply that of economic power struggles, it polices even the very existence of woman.

Anarchafeminism: A Queer and Trans(individualist) Analysis

Image by @tripleAqueer on twtext.com

Most of the living matter is actually queer…if and only if we adopt this transidividualist perspective can we speak about womanhood outside of the modern colonial gender system and thus use that term to include all types of women: masculine women, feminine women, transwomen, female women, male women, lesbian women, bisexual women, intersex women, cis women, asexual women, queer women…all the way up to ways of being a woman that have not yet been invented…which have already and always begun” (“Imaginal Feminism” Lecture, 23:30).

Here we see a connection between feminism and queerness/transness, which is often excluded in feminist discourse. We decolonize what being a woman means, as there are historical and cultural understandings of the existence and nonexistence of gender in non-white cultures, such as two-spirit individuals in Indigenous cultures and intersex individuals in South Asian and other cultures. The idea is that these genders and refusals of gender are not a new phenomenon- these people have always existed, but buried under blinds of colonization where categorizations of “male” and “female” are more convenient. “Queering” the concept of living matter requires one to understand that nothing and no one in the world is meant to live in binaries- people metamorphosize generationally as well as even within the spans of our own individual lives. Binaries are simply impossible to impose without rejection of the humanity of folks who existed/exist/will exist, and refusals to the “can be”s and “are”s of the world.

“…any list is open to the objection that it cannot but be necessarily incomplete” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 94).

This line may be interpreted as a metaphor for the transindividual, and even the concept of all living matter being intrinsically queer or trans. Are people ever “complete” versions of themselves? Do we not transform in new places, relationships, and contexts? If any living being does see themselves as “complete,” what then is the meaning of continuation?

“…to be able not to exist is to lack power, and to be able to exist is to have power. Thus, if what necessarily exists are only finite beings, then finite beings are more powerful than an absolute infinite being, which is absurd” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 96).

This quote can be read as an analysis of cisgenderness and transness in the context of the state. Most visible figures of power in the state in colonized territories have historically been cisgender heterosexual people, with queerness and transness often being hidden or considered outsiders to mainstream society. This, then, strips these people on the peripheries of power, representation, and influence. However, this rejection of anything from the norm insists a rejection of the infinite space around the mainstream, or the “infinity.” How are we to ascribe power and authority to finite beings within binaries rather than those who are not bound to a single mode of existence, therefore giving them limitless possibilities of being, and being for each other?

“Body and mind are just two modes that express two different attributes of an infinite substance expressing itself through an infinity of attributes” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 97).

Even in the anatomy of the human body, there is a multiplicity of being, thinking, feeling, and doing. This is an interpretation of queerness and transness of the living being even without the inclusion of “sexuality.”

“The body is not an inert matter, or an essence, to which we can attribute fixed immutable properties (such as certain types of genitalia or hormone balances). Rather, the body in general and women’s bodies in particular, are processes…the term ‘woman’ becomes therefore the shortcut for a story that keeps together a series of processes and potentialities that we can associate with individuals instituted as and instituting themselves as ‘women’” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 100).

Like the soul of a person, individual bodies are in constant flux throughout life, therefore constituting themselves as a series of processes. This is especially true for women, which includes queer women, trans women, intersex women, etc. This, then, renders the title of “woman” simply as a vessel to hold not a single identity, but a multitude of experiences, thoughts, and beings all at once that interact to create all new meanings. In this way, women have always been and always will be infinite beings.

Anarchafeminism, the Individual, and the Community

Image by @tahriricn on Pinterest

“…causality must not be understood in the sense of a linear succession of events, but rather as a multiplicity of connections of causal links between individuals, which are made up of more simple and more complex individuals all causally related…every individual is constantly composed and decomposed by other individuals with which it enters into contact through a process of individuation, which involves both the infra-individual and the supra-individual levels…individuality must be understood as transindividuality” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 97).

“…imagination…is a form of bodily awareness, which means awareness of both our body and other bodies with which we come into contact and that, as such, it is always, properly speaking, a form of collective imagining” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 98).

Here, Bottici places a special emphasis on the community aspect of individual being. The forming, re-forming, and un-forming of oneself is both dependent on and a factor of the formation of community. Every individual is a product of the context of which they inhabit and the people they interact with. Every individual therefore also influences the “creation” of other people they interact with, which effects the ways communities are formed and interact with each other. Therefore, what communal implications does an understanding of transindividuality bring us to? Does an infinite openness to “otherness” of oneself and others give meaning to individual living and community survival? In what ways can we meaningfully assess transindividuality to imagine worlds beyond limiting binaries?

“…I cannot be free unless everyone else is equally free, because even if I am the master, the relationship of domination in which I participate will enslave me as much as the slave herself. But if I cannot be free unless I live surrounded by people who are equally free, that is, unless I live in a free society, then the subjection of women cannot be reduced to something that concerns only a part of society: a patriarchal society will be fundamentally oppressive for all sexes, precisely because I cannot be free on my own” (Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto 105).

The line “…I cannot be free on my own” speaks both to an institutional critique of neoliberal feminism and a rejection of state involvement, as well as the truth of the ever-existence of transindividualism. Bottici again emphasizes that the perseverance of hierarchies of sovereignty is the antithesis of true liberation for women and the transindividual. Thinking of oneself as a transindividual, we effect and are effected by the realities and essences of the communities around us. Therefore, one cannot truly be liberated unless everyone is liberated. In fact, I would argue we should not want to be free unless everyone is free.

Work Cited

Bottici, Chiara. “Bodies in Plural: Towards an Anarcha-Feminist Manifesto.” Thesis Eleven, vol.
142, 2017, pp. 91–111.
Bottici, Chiara. “Imaginal Feminism.” WHAP!- The Game of the Real: Art and the Knowledge
Project, California Institute of the Arts, West Hollywood Public Library, Los Angeles.
Lecture.

...Show All Tags
... And Couting 2018 Guangzhou Triennial 2020 abolition activism advertising aesthetics Aesthetics & Politics Aesthetics and politics affect Afro-Futurism afropessimism agonism ai AI art Aidrley Queiros Aimee Bahng algorithmic bias alt-right alum alumni American history American Mythologies anarcha-feminism Anarchafeminism Anarchism andrea fontenot Andy Warhol animal studies anime Anthropocene anti-abortion anti-blackness Antiaesthetics aporetic argentina aria dean Armor art Art Critic Art History Art prompt artificial intelligence Asia asian american art Asian Art Asian Futurity assembly associations aural auto-fiction automation Beijing Being Human beluga Biswas Mellamphy Black lives matter black out black studies black study Blm blockchain Blondie body Boots Riley borderlands Branco Sai Preto Fica Brasil bratich Bridget Crone Bring springer CalArts California Institute of the Arts calvin l. warren calvin warren Capital capital is dead capitalism carceral tech carceral technologies carceral technology care Carlos Villa cars CBGB CCM Censorship Charity Chiara Bottici china Chinese Art chinese philosophy Christian Dior Christopher Kulendran Thomas chronology cinema citizneship class Claude Monet collective Colombia Coloniality comics Community computer science Contemporary Art Contemporary Chinese Art content moderation control coronavirus Cosmetics covid Covid-19 creaturely criminal justice Crisis Criticism Critique crypto Cuba Cuba Revolution Cuban Art culture curation Dance Daniela Lieja Quintanar data data collection data sourcing Debbie Harry decoloniality Dennis Cooper desire Deway-Hagbord Diaspora dictee digital digital art digital culture Digital Media digital tools diversity Documentation Donna Haraway Doris Salcedo DOXA drag Drag King drag name drifting drones ecological ecology Ed Fornieles Édouard Glissant Eminem emory Empathy exhibition experimental experimental film experimentalpublication exploitation extinction facial hair Fascism fash-wave fashion feminism fiction film flicker fluxus foreign labor foucault franco barchiesi Frank O'Hara FREEPLAY Futura 2000 gabriel rockhill gas Gean Moreno gender geography Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari Gloria Anzaldua Grebowicz Halston Hannah Arendt Hauntology Havana Hermeneutics hip hop hipsters Hiroshi Fujiwara historicism HIV/AIDS horror human Human rights hypebeasts hyper-masculinity identity im here to learn so :)))))) image theory impressionism individuation industrial revolution industrialization infrapolitics Infrastructure Instagram Installation Intelligence Gathering Intelligence Led Policing Intergalactix internet internet of things INTERPRETATION intersectionality intimacy Invisible Hand irony j kameron carter Jaar jack bratich Jack Burnham Jazz Jean-François Lyotard Jemima Wyman Jennifer Ponce de Leon John-Michael Rivera Judith Butler Julian Stallabrass Kara Keeling Karina Alma kathy acker Kettling Khademi kinging koreanamericanliterature Kubra Khademi LA LA RIver lapd LARPing larval warfare Larvas Warfare LATERAL Latin America Latin-America Latino American Latinx Studies Latipa Laurie Anderson Les Immatériaux exhibition libidinal Line Dance linette park Lisa Nakamura Los Angeles Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions loss Louis Vuitton Luciana Parisi Mahakali Manuel Shartzberg Marc Jacobs Marianne Hirsh marketing Marvel marxism masculinity matias viegener Maurice Merleau-Ponty mckenzie wark Medea media theory Mellamphy memory metaphysics METHOD metic Mètis MGMT Misael Oquendo montage mourning Mudd Club museum Music Nan Z. Da Nandita Biswas Mellamphy Necro-Politics Necropolitics net art NFT nicholas mirzeoff Nike niunamenos noc non-fungible tokens nonhuman nylan October ontological terror ontology packers paint tube painting panopticism Parametricism Patrik Schumacher Paul Preciado Performance persuasion Peru Pettman phantasmagoria photography pleasure plurality Poetics poetry poiesis police police state police training politics pop music popular culture Pose post-human post-millennial Postmemory Predictive Policing PrEP prison abolition psychology punk QUANTITATIVE quarantine queer queer calculus queer media Queer Theory ra judy Race race and racialization Rachel Garfield Racial Empathy rationality READING Real Abstraction reality reductionism resistance Revolution rhizome Rihanna Robot Skin Ronak Kapadia Rosalind Krauss RuPaul Ryan Murphy Sarah T. Roberts sci-fi Science Fiction screenshot Sculpture sentient flesh SHAKESPEARE ShanaL Redmond skin Skoghall Konsthall smart cities smart city sneakers social media Socialism sociology Soft Science Fiction Software exhibition solitude sonic sonic voice sound space spatial justice spectacle and counter spectacle Speculative Fiction speed Spin Sri Lankan civil war Stephen Sprouse Stop LAPD Spying Coalition structural film structuralism STRUCTURE student repression subcultures suggestion superheroes Surveillance Susan Buck-Morss Swarm Intelligence syllabus systems analysis systems art Systems Esthetics T5311 Taylor Swift techno-orientalism temporality Teresa Margolles terror TEXT The Aesthetics of Net Art the archive The Body the disappointment the imaginal The Modular Body The Postmodern Condition the refrain the sky opened up with answers the tiller girls The Zapatistas Theorist in Residence theory theresahakkyungcha Thierry de Duve Thor thought experiments TikTok time Tomás Esson trans fem aesthetics trans literature Transindividual transindividuality trauma Undocumented UNDOCUMENTS Urban Space Victoria Ivanova Video Art video essay vignette virality Virtual Reality visibility visual activism visual categories visual culture Visual Studies Visuality voice VR wafaa bilal war on terror War on Youth whale WHAP Womanhood Yiyun Li Zac's Haunted House Zach Blas

Other posts by this author