Experiments in Aesthetics and Politics

Countervisualizing the Anthropocene

Published on: December 23, 2020
By: Ling Tiong

On October 23, 2020, Professor of Media, Culture, and Communication Nicholas Mirzoeff gave a public lecture as part of the West Hollywood Aesthetics and Politics (WHAP) series. The Fall 2020 Lecture Series, “Black Out: On the Surveillance of Blackness,” is presented by the CalArts School of Critical Studies and the West Hollywood Public Library. A recording of the lecture can be viewed here.

Anthropocene Antiaesthetics

Media and culture theorist Nicholas Mirzoeff has written extensively on the complex of visuality, in which we are governed through the control of what we see and sense.[1] Insofar as our notion of the “aesthetic” is derived from the ancient Greek word aisthisis, referring to sensory perception, visuality is an “antiaesthetic” regime, in which we have lost the ability to make sense of what we feel and perceive, and “the body can no longer make sense of what is presented to it.”[2] A classic example of visuality in operation is when the authorities, typically the police, tell us: “Move on, there’s nothing to see here.”[3]

These forces of visuality and antiaesthetics combine to allow us to ignore the destruction of our Earth, in part, due to a misplaced belief that those same authorities will solve it all. But in fact, no one, or nothing, has control over the Anthropocene and its unintended consequences.[4]

If our senses are out of touch with reality, and whatever we typically see or perceive is subject to continuous control and manipulation, Mirzoeff proposes asserting our agency by claiming what he calls the “right to look.” By Mirzoeff’s account, insisting upon one’s right to look despite being told “there is nothing to see here” is the beginning of political subjectivization. This formation of subjecthood is a form of recognition that occurs through the creation of an “interface between two or more people as they look at each other.”[5] The activation of this interface between more than two produces consensus, collectivity, and commons.[6]

An ‘Ephemeral Stream’

To Progress by Christine Yerie Lee is a three-minute video artwork that premiered online on October 2, 2020. The artwork takes the format of a letter, ostensibly addressed to the Indian artist and filmmaker Utkarsh Raut, whose name in Hindi translates to the eponymous “Progress.”[7] The video documents Lee’s observations of her suburban landscape and is accompanied by her ruminations in voiceover. By addressing and acknowledging its viewer, and in turn, allowing itself to be seen, To Progress creates an “interface” between Lee and its viewers.

The video begins with a view of the side of a building, perhaps a house, tinted golden yellow by the bright afternoon sun. But obscuring our view are two dark bulky shapes taking up the central portion of the frame.

Christine Yerie Lee. Still from To Progress, 2020. Image courtesy the artist.

These dark bodies are eventually revealed to be a wooden utility pole and the angled trunk of a solid monopodial palm tree. The frame never widens enough to show them in their entirety. As the camera continues to move upwards, it slowly reveals that thick industrial steel cables have been lassoed around the trunk of the palm tree in order to stay the telephone pole.

Lee offers no explicit comment on this brutal gesture, but draws our attention closer to this entanglement by overlaying a smaller video window within the larger frame, in which we see a close-up of the cables and its metal brackets. The view in the smaller window slowly travels along the cables.

Christine Yerie Lee. Still from To Progress, 2020. Image courtesy the artist.

By layering the frames on top of one another, Lee denies the viewer a unified or totalizing visual field, and instead, introduces a form of vision that is partial, decentered, and cropped. This form of vision opposes the totalizing schema of “visuality.”

To Progress contests the “antiaesthetic” by choosing to focus on these ugly, invisible, and forgotten parts of the landscapes that we live in but have learned to un-see. Lee redirects our attention to the unspectacular, these areas where there is purportedly “nothing to see here.” As a form of refutation of the regime of visuality, To Progress performs an act of countervisuality by asserting that there is something to see here.

The Storm of Progress

To Progress meditates on the strange nature of what we now refer to as “pandemic time.”[8] Lee begins, “We’re living through a historic time,” and then asks the plaintive question: “But how can one be simultaneously living… and of the past?” As Lee points out to us, the notion of “historic” time seemingly disregards those still living in the now: us. And to look at our present through the lens of the future is to take on an impossible perspective. Lee’s statement imagines and vocalizes an unspecified “we,” constituting herself together with the audience as a collective that is sharing in this same experience of paradoxical temporality.

Her voiceover continues, “Historic by definition means ‘famous or important in history / or potentially so.’” The notion of the “historic” seems to inflate the importance of our contemporary moment, singling it out from another sense of time; ordinary, everyday, and non-historic time. Yet, the present is actually not present. As Lee tells us, it has been violently destroyed and excised. “Every moment is then living up to the last / bound by the potential of the future / blasting right through the present.” This “blasting” through the present creates a rupture in linear time.

Christine Yerie Lee. Still from To Progress, 2020. Image courtesy the artist.

Through this rift in time, To Progress reinvents a return to the prehistoric. Speaking over partial views of a low-lying Los Angeles River in the middle of the dry season, Lee muses, “Maybe we did come from clay.” According to this earthen cosmology, early humans were “shifting and slipping into different states … [while] remaining pleasantly porous.” Through her retelling of a mythical origin of humankind, Lee envisions another kind of human, or at least, another kind of human body that is permeable and continuous with its environment.

During this ancient era, Lee continues, the Los Angeles River “used to come and go as it pleased / drying up and violently flooding / when it felt right / before being forced to take / the shape of a river.” Before being channelized, we imagine, this “ephemeral stream” had its own agency, preferences, and will to being.[9] By contemplating the river in the present while evoking its pasts, real and imagined, Lee creates a cyclical time loop that enfolds what Mirzoeff refers to as the “mise-en-abyme” of deep time.

A storm blows in from Paradise as the angel of history takes flight. Driven toward the future, the angel’s eyes remain fixed on the past as wreckage piles up before it. Walter Benjamin notes, “what we call progress is this storm.”[11]

Toward a Restoration of the Commons

Raut, originally from India, is based in Finland, ten hours ahead of Los Angeles, where Lee is based. As Lee notes, “I am writing this to you from your past / which will always be your history / and consequently my future / you will always precede me.” In a moment when state and international borders have been shut and travel is difficult, To Progress interpolates different places and time zones, and instantiates the possibility of solidarity across these temporal and spatial barriers. Lee invites us to be “all at once here.” For Lee, “here” is not located in space, but in time.

In this way, To Progress establishes a commons through a shared inhabiting of time. We are offered an invitation to meet in this shared time—the present: “This is an invitation to meet in the present / Taking a chance on a voyage / Towards adventure.” And this invitation is not only meant for its original addressee, Raut, but is extended to any one of us with an Internet connection and able to watch the piece.

Christine Yerie Lee. Still from To Progress, 2020. Image courtesy the artist.

If, as Lee says, every moment is “blasting” us through the present, To Progress documents a time of simultaneous destruction and creation, which Benjamin would call an “epic moment” being “blown apart in the process of construction.”[12] And as Benjamin reminds us, in contrast to these powerful forces of destruction, the potential for the new to arise does not belong to grand or dramatic gestures, but always remains “a weak messianic power.”[13]

In our time of crisis, To Progress speaks to the potential of the ugly, the murky, the wounded, and the “weak” to wedge open the possibility for the restoration of the commons. “For every second was the small gateway in time through which the Messiah might enter.”[14] The time—to look, to act, to begin— is now.

Christine Yerie Lee. Still from To Progress, 2020. Image courtesy the artist.

Special thanks to Christine Yerie Lee and Adeline Chia.


[1] Nicholas Mirzoeff, “Visualizing the Anthropocene,” Public Culture 26, No. 2 (2014): 213–32,

[2] Mirzoeff, 214.

[3] Mirzoeff, 214.

[4] Mirzoeff, 217.

[5] Nicholas Mirzoeff, “The History of the Anonymous and Horizontal Visuality” in eds. Jill H Casid and Aruna D’Souza, Art History in the Wake of the Global Turn (Williamstown, MA: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, 2014) 201.

[6] Ibid.

[7] Produced in the framework of Trojan Horse Summer School 2020.

[8] For example, see Venkatesh Rao, “Pandemic Time: A Distributed Doomsday Clock,” Noema Magazine, June 8, 2020.

[9] A similar fate befell the Mississippi River. See Nicholas Mirzoeff, How to See the World (London: Pelican Books, 2015), 248-252.

[10] Nicholas Mirzoeff, “Below The Water: Black Lives Matter and Revolutionary Time,” e-flux journal #79, Feb. 2017.

[11] Rephrased and qtd. from Walter Benjamin, “On the Concept of History” in Selected Writings: Vol. 4, 1938-1940 (Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2006) 392.

[12] Benjamin, 406.

[13] Benjamin, 390.

[14] Benjamin, 397.

...Show All Tags
... And Couting 2018 Guangzhou Triennial 2020 abolition activism advertising aesthetics Aesthetics & Politics Aesthetics and politics affect Afro-Futurism afropessimism agonism ai AI art Aidrley Queiros Aimee Bahng algorithmic bias alt-right alum alumni American history American Mythologies anarcha-feminism Anarchafeminism Anarchism andrea fontenot Andy Warhol animal studies anime Anthropocene anti-abortion anti-blackness Antiaesthetics aporetic argentina aria dean Armor art Art Critic Art History Art prompt artificial intelligence Asia asian american art Asian Art Asian Futurity assembly associations aural auto-fiction automation Beijing Being Human beluga Biswas Mellamphy Black lives matter black out black studies black study Blm blockchain Blondie body Boots Riley borderlands Branco Sai Preto Fica Brasil bratich Bridget Crone Bring springer CalArts California Institute of the Arts calvin l. warren calvin warren Capital capital is dead capitalism carceral tech carceral technologies carceral technology care Carlos Villa cars CBGB CCM Censorship Charity Chiara Bottici china Chinese Art chinese philosophy Christian Dior Christopher Kulendran Thomas chronology cinema citizneship class Claude Monet collective Colombia Coloniality comics Community computer science Contemporary Art Contemporary Chinese Art content moderation control coronavirus Cosmetics covid Covid-19 creaturely criminal justice Crisis Criticism Critique crypto Cuba Cuba Revolution Cuban Art culture curation Dance Daniela Lieja Quintanar data data collection data sourcing Debbie Harry decoloniality Dennis Cooper desire Deway-Hagbord Diaspora dictee digital digital art digital culture Digital Media digital tools diversity Documentation Donna Haraway Doris Salcedo DOXA drag Drag King drag name drifting drones ecological ecology Ed Fornieles Édouard Glissant Eminem emory Empathy exhibition experimental experimental film experimentalpublication exploitation extinction facial hair Fascism fash-wave fashion feminism fiction film flicker fluxus foreign labor foucault franco barchiesi Frank O'Hara FREEPLAY Futura 2000 gabriel rockhill gas Gean Moreno gender geography Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari Gloria Anzaldua Grebowicz Halston Hannah Arendt Hauntology Havana Hermeneutics hip hop hipsters Hiroshi Fujiwara historicism HIV/AIDS horror human Human rights hypebeasts hyper-masculinity identity im here to learn so :)))))) image theory impressionism individuation industrial revolution industrialization infrapolitics Infrastructure Instagram Installation Intelligence Gathering Intelligence Led Policing Intergalactix internet internet of things INTERPRETATION intersectionality intimacy Invisible Hand irony j kameron carter Jaar jack bratich Jack Burnham Jazz Jean-François Lyotard Jemima Wyman Jennifer Ponce de Leon John-Michael Rivera Judith Butler Julian Stallabrass Kara Keeling Karina Alma kathy acker Kettling Khademi kinging koreanamericanliterature Kubra Khademi LA LA RIver lapd LARPing larval warfare Larvas Warfare LATERAL Latin America Latin-America Latino American Latinx Studies Latipa Laurie Anderson Les Immatériaux exhibition libidinal Line Dance linette park Lisa Nakamura Los Angeles Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions loss Louis Vuitton Luciana Parisi Mahakali Manuel Shartzberg Marc Jacobs Marianne Hirsh marketing Marvel marxism masculinity matias viegener Maurice Merleau-Ponty mckenzie wark Medea media theory Mellamphy memory metaphysics METHOD metic Mètis MGMT Misael Oquendo montage mourning Mudd Club museum Music Nan Z. Da Nandita Biswas Mellamphy Necro-Politics Necropolitics net art NFT nicholas mirzeoff Nike niunamenos noc non-fungible tokens nonhuman nylan October ontological terror ontology packers paint tube painting panopticism Parametricism Patrik Schumacher Paul Preciado Performance persuasion Peru Pettman phantasmagoria photography pleasure plurality Poetics poetry poiesis police police state police training politics pop music popular culture Pose post-human post-millennial Postmemory Predictive Policing PrEP prison abolition psychology punk QUANTITATIVE quarantine queer queer calculus queer media Queer Theory ra judy Race race and racialization Rachel Garfield Racial Empathy rationality READING Real Abstraction reality reductionism resistance Revolution rhizome Rihanna Robot Skin Ronak Kapadia Rosalind Krauss RuPaul Ryan Murphy Sarah T. Roberts sci-fi Science Fiction screenshot Sculpture sentient flesh SHAKESPEARE ShanaL Redmond skin Skoghall Konsthall smart cities smart city sneakers social media Socialism sociology Soft Science Fiction Software exhibition solitude sonic sonic voice sound space spatial justice spectacle and counter spectacle Speculative Fiction speed Spin Sri Lankan civil war Stephen Sprouse Stop LAPD Spying Coalition structural film structuralism STRUCTURE student repression subcultures suggestion superheroes Surveillance Susan Buck-Morss Swarm Intelligence syllabus systems analysis systems art Systems Esthetics T5311 Taylor Swift techno-orientalism temporality Teresa Margolles terror TEXT The Aesthetics of Net Art the archive The Body the disappointment the imaginal The Modular Body The Postmodern Condition the refrain the sky opened up with answers the tiller girls The Zapatistas Theorist in Residence theory theresahakkyungcha Thierry de Duve Thor thought experiments TikTok time Tomás Esson trans fem aesthetics trans literature Transindividual transindividuality trauma Undocumented UNDOCUMENTS Urban Space Victoria Ivanova Video Art video essay vignette virality Virtual Reality visibility visual activism visual categories visual culture Visual Studies Visuality voice VR wafaa bilal war on terror War on Youth whale WHAP Womanhood Yiyun Li Zac's Haunted House Zach Blas

Other posts by this author